Seiders v. Giles
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
APPEAL BY PLAINTIFF FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BERKS COUNTY. January Term 1891, Sup. Ct.; court below, number and term not given. On November 10, 1890, Daniel Y. Seiders brought an action of partition against Mary Giles and others.
Read the full summary
APPEAL BY PLAINTIFF FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BERKS COUNTY. January Term 1891, Sup. Ct.; court below, number and term not given. On November 10, 1890, Daniel Y. Seiders brought an action of partition against Mary Giles and others. The plaintiff’s declaration averred that as tenant by the curtesy he was possessed of an estate for life in a certain lot of ground in the city of Reading, and that the defendants were together seised of the remainder in fee-simple and refused to permit partition thereof to be made, etc. To this declaration the defendants filed a general demurrer. After…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
The opinion of the learned judge of the court below con- ' tains such a thorough and exhaustive discussion of the question involved in this case that we affirm the judgment for the reasons given by him.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by12 opinions
- Lombardo v. DeMarcoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Embleton v. McMechenOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Etnier v. PascoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Russo, F. v. Polidoro, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Holmes v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.