Legal Opinion

Heilman v. Heilman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1974No. 7410DC772PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiff in this action seeks an absolute divorce, pursuant to G.S. 50-6, on the ground of one year’s separation. Defendant may defeat the action only by affirmatively establishing that the separation was caused by plaintiff’s abandoning her. Overby v. Overby, 272 N.C. 636, 158 S.E. 2d 799 (1968) ; Pickens v. Pickens, 258 N.C. 84, 127 S.E. 2d 889 (1962). Abandonment, as an affirmative defense, is conduct by plaintiff such as would entitle defendant to a divorce from bed and board or alimony without divorce. Hicks v. Hicks, 275 N.C. 370, 167 S.E. 2d 761 (1969). In order to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Caddell v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Panhorst v. PanhorstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Taylor v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Hicks v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patton v. PattonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Tan v. TanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Patton v. PattonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API