Legal Opinion

People v. Padilla

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 2002No. F037946PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GOMES, J.

In a murder prosecution, is evidence of a hallucination admissible at the guilt phase to reduce first degree murder to second degree murder or to mitigate murder to voluntary manslaughter? We hold that evidence of a hallucination—a perception with no objective reality—is inadmissible to negate malice so as to mitigate murder to voluntary manslaughter but is admissible to negate deliberation and premeditation so as to reduce first degree murder to second degree murder.

Factual and Procedural History

Shortly after an early morning prisoner count, correctional officers at Wasco…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. People v. ElmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  4. People v. Robbins, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. MEJIA-LENARESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API