People v. Padilla
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GOMES, J.
In a murder prosecution, is evidence of a hallucination admissible at the guilt phase to reduce first degree murder to second degree murder or to mitigate murder to voluntary manslaughter? We hold that evidence of a hallucination—a perception with no objective reality—is inadmissible to negate malice so as to mitigate murder to voluntary manslaughter but is admissible to negate deliberation and premeditation so as to reduce first degree murder to second degree murder.
Factual and Procedural History
Shortly after an early morning prisoner count, correctional officers at Wasco…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Daniels v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- People v. ElmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. Robbins, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. MEJIA-LENARESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.