Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Sealfit, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 14, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01388Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY Case No.: 3:19-cv-1388-GPC-AGS INSURANCE COMPANY, 12 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT Plaintiff, 13 SEALFIT’S MOTION TO STAY v. 14 SEALFIT, INC., [ECF No. 15] 15 Defendant. 16 17 Before the Court is Defendant SEALFIT, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Sealfit”) motion 18 to stay proceedings. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff Philadelphia Insurance Company (“Plaintiff” 19 or “Philadelphia”) filed an opposition on November 15, 2019. ECF No. 20. Sealfit filed 20 a reply on November 27, 2019. ECF No. 21. 21 FACTUAL…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.