Legal Opinion
Estate of Sullivan
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1954No. Civ. 20345PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
By his holographic will which was duly admitted to probate, testator left “all my holdings personal and real, to my wife Charlotte L. Sullivan. Except I want to will or give to each of my douthers (sic) Harriett, & Clarabelle & Thula, $2,000.00 each. The money to be raised by sale of the SE % of Sec. 26, Twp. 7 N Rg. 10 W or they may have the deed to settle same. My wife Charlotte is to have the right to sell anything else to finish improving the % interest I have in the NE 14 of Sec. 2 7 N Rg. 10 W. so that the income should keep her. No lawyer or court is to misconstrue my intentions due to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nielsen v. JepsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Kramer v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1912
- McKee v. Cal. Annual Conference of the Methodist Episcopal ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Church v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Douds' EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
3Cited by4 opinions
- Loescher v. LoescherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Estate of EhrenfelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Crocker-Citizens National Bank v. CrockettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Estate of McShane CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2015