Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Bonner v. District Court of First Judicial District

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1949No. 8902Published

1DissentJustice Angstman

(dissenting) :

I agree with many of the elementary principles of law announced in the majority opinion but deny that they furnish any assistance in determining the question before us. I do not take issue with what is said in the majority opinion .regarding the learning and achievements of Governor Ayers and Governor Bonner. I merely assert that the question before us is not in any manner affected by the experience, qualifications or ability of either. The so-called Hitler Bill (Ch. 5, Laws of 1937) re ferred to in the majority opinion has nothing to do with the issue before us. It is limited…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Akin v. LoefflerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Roth v. State ex rel. KurtzIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State Ex Rel. Nagle v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Board of Street Commissioners v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
  5. Turrill v. ErskineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API