Richter v. Monarch Stamping Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff appeals from a Worker’s Compensation Appeal Board ruling denying him benefits for failure to comply with the 120-day notice requirement of MCL 418.441; MSA 17.237(441).
Plaintiff was employed by defendant Townsend & Bottum from May 1970 to April 1974 as a carpenter’s helper. He was also employed by the defendant Monarch from 1965 to June 1973 as a press operator and parts finisher.
In April of 1974, plaintiff suffered a hernia. *768Compensation benefits were paid through September of 1974, however, plaintiff never returned to work due to a layoff. It was during treatment of the hernia…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lewis v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Thomas v. Griffin Wheel Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Spartan Asphalt Paving Co. v. Tri-Cities Construction, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Smith v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Ramos v. Production Steel Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chadwick v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981