Parnell v. United American Insurance
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Bussey, Justice.
This action arose out of the application for and issuance by the respondent of a “guaranteed renewable” hospital and surgical expense policy. The plaintiff-appellant at the trial elected to proceed on the theory of an action in fraud and deceit. The jury returned a verdict for appellant for both actual and punitive damages. The trial judge thereafter granted respondent’s motion for a judgment non obstante veredicto, from which order comes this appeal.
Appellant’s complaint alleged that she had been defrauded and damaged as the result of certain alleged fraudulent statements…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lillie B. Thomas v. the Amer. WorkmenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- J.B. Colt Company v. BrittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- O'Connor v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Branham v. Capital Life & Health Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
3Cited by7 opinions
- Doub v. Weathersby-Breeland Insurance AgencySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. Orangeburg Paint & Decorating Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Guy v. National Old Line InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
- Maw v. McAlisterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Hipp v. KENNESAW LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.