Commonwealth v. Mullins

GOLDBERG, J.,

This opinion is written pursuant to Thomas Mullins’ (petitioner) post-sentence motion challenging the constitutionality of the Pennsylvania Registration of Sexual Offender’s Act, commonly known as Megan’s Law II. The primary issues presented by petitioner are whether: (1) the absence of judicial review for the lifetime reporting, notification and counseling provisions of the Act render Megan’s Law

11 unconstitutionally excessive and (2) whether Megan’s Law II is unconstitutionally vague.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Petitioner was originally charged with involuntary deviate sexual intercourse…