Legal Opinion

Capanis v. Clark

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 8, 2019No. 3:19-cv-04562Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MATTHEW J CAPANIS, Case No. 19-cv-04562-SI 10 Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE 11 v. TO AMEND 12 KENT CLARK, Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 8, 9 13 Respondent. 14 15 Matthew J. Capanis filed this pro se action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 16 § 2254. His petition is now before the court for review pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2243

and Rule 4 of 17 the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. His several 18 miscellaneous requests also are before the court for consideration. 19…

2Cases cited6 opinions

Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
Swarthout v. CookeSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
Edgar M. Hendricks v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
William John Wacht v. Harold J. Cardwell and the Attorney General of the State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.