Legal Opinion

In Re Contempt Proceedings Against Matthews

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1938No. 6382PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

This is a contempt proceeding. A statement of the case appears in In re Matthews, 57 Ida. 75, 62 Pac. (2d) 578, 111 A. L. R. 13, wherein a motion to make the affidavit or complaint more definite and certain and a demurrer to the affidavit or complaint were considered, both overruled and the defendant Matthews required to answer. The statement contained in the before-mentioned opinion is subject to the changes made by stipulation as hereafter disclosed. Upon S. E. Matthews filing his answer, this court, by order, referred the cause to the Honorable Guy Stevens, district judge of the sixth…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Illinois State Bar Ass'n v. Peoples Stock Yards State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. People v. . AlfaniNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. In Re DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  5. Eley v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  3. Hulse v. CrigerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Lukas v. Bar Ass'n of Montgomery County, Maryland, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. People v. SipperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API