Slmbey v. State

MlKELL, Judge.

Following a bench trial in which he appeared pro se, Akhenaten Amen’ra Slmbey, again acting pro se, appeals his conviction on two counts of speeding, contending in fourteen enumerations of error that his conviction is void and in conflict with the law of the land. Because we conclude that Slmbey has abandoned his enumerated errors on appeal, we affirm.

Slmhey’s brief fails to comport with the rules of this Court in fatal ways. His brief does not “contain a succinct and accurate statement of the proceedings below and the material facts relevant to the appeal,” 1 nor does it state…