Jones v. State

Doyle, Judge.

Quintus Jones III, proceeding pro se, appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol to the extent he was a less safe driver (“DUI less safe”). 1 In several enumerations of error, Jones argues that: (1) his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) the State failed “to produce an [information or [indictment”; (3) the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress based on lack of probable cause; (4) the State committed a Brady 2 violation; and (5) the trial court lacked jurisdiction, and he was denied his constitutional right to due process.…