Profesco Corp. v. Dehm
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann
In May 1988, Profesco Corporation brought suit against Marilyn Dehm, seeking $2,374.68 plus costs and attorney fees and claiming that she owed Profesco money pursuant to a note she allegedly signed. Profesco claimed Dehm owed this sum as a result of a premium finance agreement. Dehm answered the complaint by denying the allegations. She also asserted as an affirmative defense that the note did not contain her signature.
Dehm later filed a counterclaim against Profesco seeking damages under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 1211/2, par. 262 et…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Monier v. ChamberlainIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Sakosko v. Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Fine Arts Distributors v. Hilton Hotel Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Pemberton v. TiemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Uhr v. Lutheran General HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Midwesco-Paschen Joint Venture for Viking Projects v. Imo Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Parkway Bank and Trust Company v. KorzenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- National Wrecking Co. v. Midwest Terminal Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- National Wrecking Co. v. MIDWEST TERM. CORP.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.