Legal Opinion
United States v. Cyril Plainbull Arvilla Plainbull
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1992No. 91-35224PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge: .
Cyril and Arvilla Plainbull, enrolled members of the Crow Tribe, reside on allotted lands located on the western side of the Crow Reservation near Pryor, Montana. Situated next to the Plainbulls’ allotments are reservation lands held in trust by the United States for the Crow Tribe, which are used as tribal range units for grazing livestock. The Plainbulls have, for many years, grazed livestock on .the tribal range units without a valid grazing permit and without paying grazing fees.
After several years of. documented trespass by the Plainbulls’ livestock on tribal lands,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Deborah Jackson v. Payday Financial, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Kevin F. Marchand v. Mercy Medical Center, an Idaho Corporation, and Neil K. Farris, D.O.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Silber v. MabonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. James Robert HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.