Clay v. Clark
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Lake Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellant presents two general reasons in support of her prayer for a reversal. The first of these is, that the court admitted incompetent evidence over her objection; the second, that the verdict is contrary to the evidence.
There is nothing properly in the record showing that objections were made, or exceptions reserved, to the admission of incompetent evidence. There is, in fact, no properly authenticated bill of exceptions in the record. The judge who tried the case does not sign a bill of exceptions, but simply certifies that certain evidence is correctly exhibited. The attestation is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Delphi v. LoweryIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Russell v. BranhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
- Millikan v. State ex rel. BishopIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Powers v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lankford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Pennsylvania Co. v. SearsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Shimer v. Butler UniversityIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Cosgrove v. CosbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Weaver v. KennedyIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.