State v. Pannell
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.
¶1 Daniel Pannell pleaded guilty to incest and child molestation. His lengthy sentence was suspended pending satisfactory progress in sexual offender treatment, *224among other things. Unfortunately, he failed to make satisfactory progress and his suspended sentence was revoked. He now contends he is entitled to credit for the time his sentence was suspended, at least to the extent that his time incarcerated, his time in postconfinement community custody, and his time on the suspended sentence added together exceed the statutory maximum for class B felonies. We conclude he is not entitled to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Jones v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. JordanWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- John Doe G v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State v. WheelerWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- In re the Personal Restraint of LainWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Pers. Restraint of LainWashington Supreme Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.