Legal Opinion

Jim v. CIT Financial Services Corporation

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1975No. 10200PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEPHENSON, Justice.

Appellant (Jim) is an enrolled member of the Navajo Nation residing on the Navajo Reservation in San Juan County, New Mexico. Mr. Jim purchased a pickup truck in Farmington, New Mexico and defendant-appellee (CIT) financed the purchase. Thereafter, Jim defaulted by failing to make payments as required under the contract. Two agents of CIT came upon the Navajo Reservation and, without the written consent of Jim, repossessed the pickup. CIT filed no replevin or other action in the Navajo Tribal Court. Subsequently, Jim filed suit in the District Court of San Juan…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. FetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Pink v. A. A. A. Highway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States Ex Rel. MacKey v. CoxeSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  4. Americana of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Samuel R. Kaplus and J. Kaplus & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  5. Jim v. CIT Financial Services CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Mary Jane WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas David MARCHINGTON; Inland Empire Shows, Inc., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Smith v. PRICE'S CREAMERIES, DIV., ETC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Adoption of BuehlWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. United Wholesale Liquor Co. v. Brown-Forman Distillers Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Queets Band of Indians v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1984

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API