Lee v. Augusta Coach Company
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Justice.
The Court of Appeals held that the evidence did not authorize a verdict that the collision in any way contributed to the death of the plaintiff’s husband and reversed the judgment denying the defendant’s motion for a judgment non obstante veredicto. This judgment was error.
“A state of things proved to have once existed is presumed to have continued to exist until a change or some adequate cause of change appears.” Glenn v. Tankersley, 187 Ga. 129 (7) (200 SE 709). And mental or physical impairment is never presumed. See Ellis v. Southern R. Co., 89 Ga. App. 407, 414 (79 SE2d…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ellis v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Glenn v. TankersleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lopez v. MaesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Sokolic v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Augusta Coach Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Gulf Life Insurance Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Langston v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.