Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Rychlowski
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 18, 2017No. 16-1662PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Paul Murphy was convicted of rape by force in Los Angeles County, California 37 years ago. Because of that conviction, California law required Murphy, while he resided in the state, to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life. Murphy moved to Wisconsin 21 years after he committed this offense and was arrested and convicted of aggravated assault. While he never registered with the State of Wisconsin as a sex offender, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections (the “Department”) determined that because of his California conviction, Murphy should register as a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Colbert v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- McKune v. LileSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Easterling v. ThurmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Shane Kitterman v. City of BellevilleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- Alan Cross, individually on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Brendan Kelly, in his official Capacity as Director of the Illinois State PoliceDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2025
- Calvin Glover v. James SchraufnagelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Clarence M. Easterling v. Michael ThurmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.