Powell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentJustice Todd
At issue in this appeal is principally a question of statutory construction: in allowing representation in unemployment compensation hearings to be performed by “an attorney or other representative,” 43 P.S. § 774, did the legislature intend to exclude suspended attorneys? The majority never fully addresses this question; rather, in my view, it conflates this Court’s undisputed authority over attorneys with a putative obligation of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (the “Board”) to enforce our disciplinary pronouncements. In so doing, the majority allows the Board to overlook its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Slater v. Rimar, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Harkness v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Commonwealth, Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Hayes v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.