Legal Opinion

People v. Perkins

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 11, 1993No. 5 — 92—0415PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lewis

The issue presented in this appeal is whether a defendant who is in jail for an offense for which he has asserted his fifth amendment right to counsel can be surreptitiously questioned by undercover agents regarding a second, unrelated offense. We hold that under the circumstances and facts of this case, the surreptitious questioning by undercover government agents violated defendant’s fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination. U.S. Const., amend. V.

On Saturday, March 30, 1986, defendant was arrested for aggravated battery. While in jail over the weekend, an undercover law…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. VillalobosIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. NashAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. People v. Orozco, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. People v. HuntIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. BurnfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API