Legal Opinion

People v. Villalobos

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 2000No. 88323PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

At issue in this appeal is whether defendant, Samuel Villalobos, invoked his fifth amendment right to counsel pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, 86 S. Ct. 1602 (1966), by filing a form at a bond hearing that stated defendant would not participate in “any questioning, identification process or other procedures on any case or matter” without his counsel present. The appellate court concluded that he did not. No. 1 — 96—1139 (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23). We allowed defendant’s petition for leave to appeal (177 Ill. 2d R. 315) and now affirm the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. Christopher K.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. ApplebySupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Hannon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. HamblyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. United States v. SeayCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API