Legal Opinion

Doorack v. Board of Adjustment

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1986No. 50697PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Presiding Judge.

Owners, William and Marilyn B. Doo-rack, appeal from the judgment of the circuit court affirming the decision of the Board of Adjustment of the City of Town and Country which denied them a permit to construct a second driveway from their residence to an adjacent public street. We affirm.

Owners submitted plans to the Building Commissioner for a new home in a subdivision located in the City of Town and Country (City). The plans depicted two driveways. The first driveway was a circle drive in the front of the residence which exited onto a subdivision street, Todforth…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. MeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. Wolfner v. Board of AdjustmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Volkman v. City of KirkwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. ZahnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. WardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Taylor v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Blue SpringsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Tucker v. McDonaldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Roeder v. Board of Adjustment of Town & CountryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Eco-Site, LLC v. The City of University City, MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API