Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Kentucky Traction Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 13, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Winn —

Reversing.

On July 25, 1893, tbe appellant Eailroad Company and tbe Capital Eailway Company entered into tbe following contracts:

“WHEEEAS, Tbe Capital Eailway Company of Frankfort wishes to cross with its street-car railway, tbe main track of tbe Louisville & Nashville Eailroad at Ann street, in tbe city of Frankfort, Ky., and
“WHEEEAS, Tbe Louisville & Nashville Eailroad Company has consented that said Capital Eailway Company may make said crossing upon tbe terms and conditions set forth herein, to-wit:
*514“NOW, THEREFORE, This contract, made • and 'entered into…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville & N. R. R. v. BiddellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  2. Hammonds v. EadsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Conley v. FairchildCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Clover Ridge Planting & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Blue Diamond Plaster Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Dairy Co-Operative Ass'n v. Brandes CreameryOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Enterprise Foundry & MacHine Works v. Miners' Elkhorn Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Louisville Transit Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API