Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Selectmen of Needham

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 9, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The case was submitted on briefs.

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

This is a bill in equity under R,. L. c. 25, § 100, by ten taxpayers of the town of Needham, to enjoin the defendants, who are the board of selectmen, from entering into contracts for the expenditure of money for the maintenance of its fire department.

It was within the scope of municipal authority for the town to appropriate money “for fire department maintenance,” and the appropriation ordinarily could be expended by the selectmen not merely for current expenses, but for necessary repairs of the fire or engine houses, Tainter v. Worcester, 123 Mass. 311, 316, and cases cited. But the board…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tainter v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Welch v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Long v. SargentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Perry v. StoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fiske v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Whiting v. Mayor of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Mayor of Haverhill v. Water Commissioners of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Pope v. BerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API