Legal Opinion

Grant v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 25, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-0308PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.

Two groups of plaintiffs in these consolidated cases have brought actions challenging the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service’s (“APHIS”) interim decision partially deregulating a genetically engineered variety of sugar beet. APHIS has since issued a final decision fully deregulating the sugar beets, and the challenged interim decision has expired. For the reasons explained herein, the Court will dismiss these actions as moot.

BACKGROUND

Sugar beets are leafy green vegetables with a sucrose-rich tap…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chang v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
  2. Lewis v. AzarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
  3. Public Citizen Health Research Group v. AcostaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API