Legal Opinion

Public Citizen Health Research Group v. Acosta

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 26, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-1729Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC CITIZEN HEALTH RESEARCH GROUP et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 18-1729 (TJK) PATRICK PIZZELLA et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In May 2018, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) posted an announcement on its website informing certain employers that they were no longer required to comply with a workplace-injury data reporting regulation OSHA had promulgated several years earlier. Under the regulation in question, covered employers had to provide the information to OHSA electronically on a set of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API