United States v. Mitchneck
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, District Judge.
This is a rule to show cause why the search warrant issued in this case should not be quashed and the evidence obtained thereunder suppressed.
Prohibition- agents were admitted to tbe residence of Mitehneck on the representation that they were electric refrigerator salesmen and on the representation that they had mutual acquaintances. These representations were entirely false. In order to make the false representations appear to be true and deceive Mitehneck, they produced a note which ono of them had written, including the signature, as follows: “Dave, These fellows are…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Fraternal Order of Eagles, No. 778 v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
3Cited by21 opinions
- I. C. Turner and E. v. Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Commonwealth v. MorrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- United States v. ReckisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
- United States v. James Bush and Reva Finchum BushCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.