Hicks v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
157 Ga. App. 79 (1981)
276 S.E.2d 129
HICKS
v.
THE STATE.
60922.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Decided January 9, 1981.
Gerald P. Word, for appellant.
William F. Lee, Jr., District Attorney, Gerald S. Stovall, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
DEEN, Presiding Judge.
1. In an alleged consent search the burden is on the state to establish that the consent was voluntarily given and not the result of duress or coercion. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U. S. 218 (93 SC 2041, 36 LE2d 854) (1973); Code v. State, 234 Ga. 90, 93 (214 SE2d 873) (1975). The defendant here signed a consent to search. On a…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayson v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Code v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Redd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.