Legal Opinion

US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Lehman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 7, 1990No. 88-1483PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an uninsured motorist case with a very interesting set of facts. James H. Lehman, Jr., was employed as a salesman at Regal Nissan automobile dealership in 1986. He agreed one day to accompany Mark McCauley, who purported to be a potential customer, to McCauley's home in order to pick up his automobile. It was Lehman's understanding that McCauley was planning to use it as a trade-in for a Nissan. The two left the dealership in a Nissan 300-ZX that was owned by the dealership. McCauley drove. When they turned onto the street where McCauley had said he lived, however, McCauley slowed the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ala. Farm Bur. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. v. MitchellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. PetersenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. Ex Parte US Fidelity & Guar. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Lee v. BurdetteCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  5. Taliaferro v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API