Legal Opinion

Stevens v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 10, 1994No. 16-92-04672; CA A80158PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Following an indictment for rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375, petitioner was convicted, in a trial to the court, of sexual abuse in the second degree, ORS 163.425. He sought postconviction relief, alleging that his trial counsel was constitutionally inadequate, because he failed to investigate and contact witnesses at the victim’s school who were capable of impeaching portions of the victim’s testimony at trial and in failing to have a urologist testify that petitioner is impotent and was so at the time when the sexual contact with the victim occurred. The postconviction court denied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Yeager v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Mellem v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Stevens v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Horn v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Stevens v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Horn v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API