Carter v. Buscher
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:
Civil rights action.
The facts are singular.
Cross-motions for summary judgment.
Judgment for Defendants.
Case closed.
I. Facts
Plaintiff’s husband, Raymond Ruhl, was being investigated by the ISP in January, 1988, for solicitation to murder his wife— the Plaintiff. In fact, during the investigation Plaintiff was offered and accepted protective custody by the ISP. With the assistance of a co-conspirator, Roger Arke-bauer, the police obtained sufficient evidence to authorize Ruhl’s arrest. See Arkebauer v. Kiley, 751 F.Supp. 783 (C.D.Ill.1990).
Ruhl worked as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brower Ex Rel. Estate of Caldwell v. County of InyoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carter v. BuscherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Carter v. BuscherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Plaka v. DrinskiDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993