Legal Opinion

Young Ti v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 1, 1917No. Nos. 2255, 2256Published

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Charles P. Orr, Judge. Deportation proceedings by the United States against Young Ti, alias Yok Ti, alias Lee Yok Ti, ascertained to be Lee Yung Dye, and against Soo Kan, alias Lee Soo Kan. Prom orders of deportation, separately entered after a joint hearing, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

These are appeals from two orders of deportation separately entered by the District Court after a joint hearing. Chinese Exclusion Acts (Act Oct. 1, 1888, c. 1064, 25 Stat. 504 [Comp. St. 1916, §§ 4303-4305]; Act May 5, 1892, c. 60, 27 Stat. 25 [Comp. St. 1916, §§ 4315-4323]; Act Nov. 3, 1893, c. 14, 28 Stat. 7 [Comp. St. 1916, §§ 4320-4324]). The cases raise no questions of law, the one issue being the place of the defendants’ nativity.

[1,2] The defendants were Chinese laborers charged upon arrest with being unlawfully within the United States. 25 Stat. 504. They met…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dai v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
  2. Woo Vey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  3. Delaware, L. & W. R. v. PerrottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  4. Lit v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API