Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Scher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 20, 2002PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

Justice NEWMAN.

We granted the Commonwealth’s Petition for Allowance of Appeal to decide whether the Commonwealth violated Stephen Barry Scher’s (Scher) rights to due process of law under the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania by the twenty-year delay in charging Scher with the murder of Martin Dillon (Dillon). We find that the twenty-year delay did not violate the due process rights of Scher and reverse the Superior Court.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Martin Dillon died of a gunshot wound to the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TielschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Com. v. Urwin, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Commonwealth v. MessersmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API