Fetz v. Leyendecker
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Assumpsit by John P. Fetz against Peter Leyendecker for the amount of certain judgments. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant upon writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
This cause was appealed by the defendant. The findings filed by the trial judge are, in substance, that: (1) Plaintiff recovered a circuit court judgment for $52 damages, costs $37.07, against the defendant on February 17, 1894; (2) on the same date Brenner recovered a circuit court judgment against defendant for costs taxed at $37.92; (3) on June 9, 1903, Brenner assigned his judgment to plaintiff; (4) on August 6, 1897, one Averill, claiming to represent Henry J. Felker, the at*356torney of record for the prevailing party in both of said cases, accepted from the defendant $12 in full settlement…
2Cited by13 opinions
- State Bar Grievance Administrator v. EstesMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Presnell v. Wayne Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Henderson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Mich. Nat'l Bank of Detroit v. PatmonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Nelson v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.