Legal Opinion

Chattanooga-Dayton Bus Line v. Lynch

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 25, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, J.

In view of the conclusions reached in this case it will not be necessary to state the case further than to say, that the plaintiff in error, F. S. Wingate, was the owner of a bus and operating the same in Hamilton county, under the trade name of Chattanooga-Dayton Bus Line, and had taken out a policy of insurance with defendant, the New York Indemnity Company, under Chapter 729 of the Acts of the General Assembly of the State of Tennessee for the year 1925, which company was also made party to the suit.

The declaration was filed also against the Insurance Company by the defendant in error, who…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RayTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Railroad v. EgertonTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Ellis v. EllisTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Cody v. Roane Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Whittaker v. Tennessee Central Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cole v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  2. Granert v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  3. Gray v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Duke v. ScottTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Cochran v. National Life & Accident Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API