Sullivan v. South Central Bell

This is an appeal from the trial court’s action granting a motion for summary judgment.

Appellant, Gregory Sullivan, contends the trial court violated certain constitutional rights when it ruled in favor of South Central Bell’s motion for summary judgment.

Mr. Sullivan’s constitutional arguments regarding the trial court’s failure to allow him a trial by jury, etc., are clearly without merit. Rule 56, A.R.C.P. The dispositive issue is whether the trial court erred in granting South Central Bell’s motion for summary judgment. We find the trial court acted properly and affirm.

The record reveals…