Legal Opinion

Schraub v. Town of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Town of Hempstead appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated June 23, 1989, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the contentions of the defendant Town of Hempstead, we conclude that a triable issue of fact exists with respect to whether the defendant town was affirmatively negligent in laying a road patch which had cracked and settled…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Hantz v. FishmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Lakeside Construction, Inc. v. Depew & Schetter Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Piccirillo v. PiccirilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ricciuti v. Village of TuckahoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Colvin v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API