Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Davison

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1976No. 258PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

The sole meritorious claim in the instant case is whether the lower court failed to clarify the jury’s confusion concerning an important issue in appellant’s trial, as reflected in the jury’s questions to the court. 1

On June 6, 1974, a cashier at the Penn Fruit store at Broad and Wingohocking Streets, Philadelphia, noticed a young girl crying, near the cashier’s register. The cashier asked the girl, nine-year-old Antoinette Key, whether anything was wrong. The child stated that a man had hurt her. The cashier called over the store manager, Robert Fiorelli, to take care of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MummaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. PankrazSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. WilkinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API