Legal Opinion

Building Owners & Managers Ass'n v. City of Pittsburgh

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

Service Employees International Union, Local 3, and Service Employees International Union, CLC (collectively, Union), appeal an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County invalidating Pittsburgh City Ordinance 22-2004, also known as The Protection of Displaced Contract Workers Ordinance. In this case, we consider whether the Ordinance was ultra vires by reason of Section 2962(f) of the Home Rule Charter and Optional Plans Law, 53 Pa.C.S. § 2962(f).

On November 30, 2004, Pittsburgh City Council enacted The Protection of Displaced Contract Workers Ordinance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartman v. City of AllentownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Fisher v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Smaller Manufacturers Council v. Council of PittsburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Building Owners & Managers Ass'n v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Youssef v. Anvil InternationalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Building Owners & Managers Ass'n v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Landlord Service Bureau, Inc. v. The City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API