Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Tidwell Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 8, 1985No. 84-1148PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Is the trial judge of a county to which a case has been transferred under Rule 82 (d)(1), A.R.Civ.P., authorized to consider a motion to retransfer the case to the county in which it was initially filed? This is the issue presented by this petition for writ of mandamus. We hold that he is not and grant the writ.

On November 23, 1983, respondent/plaintiff Waldrep filed suit in Jefferson County against petitioners/defendants Tidwell Industries (Tidwell), Tidwell Brokers, Inc. (Brokers), and International Harvester Company, Inc., seeking damages for personal injuries suffered in a tractor/trailer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Medical Service Administration v. DickersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Ex Parte MorrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Ex Parte ManessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Hodges v. General Shale Products Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lawler Mobile Homes, Inc. v. TarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Elmore County Com'n v. RagonaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ex Parte MedPartners, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Ex Parte HicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Ex Parte BlountSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API