Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maas Bros., Inc. v. Green

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 3, 1966No. G-362Published

1DissentRawls, Chief Judge

In my opinion, the chancellor and the majority failed to give proper weight to the history of Section 201.08, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., when read in light of pertinent judicial decisions construing same, and by such failure reached an erroneous conclusion.

As stated in the majority opinion affirming the judgment appealed, the chancellor concluded that the instruments utilized by Maas fell within the verbiage of Section 201.08(1). The history of this subsection which was enacted in 1931 is important when read in conjunction with decisions construing same. In 1934, the Federal District Court,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. IshamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Devore v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  3. Metropolis Publishing Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. Dundee Corporation v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  5. Lee v. KenanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API