Legal Opinion
Pamela Taylor v. Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided May 27, 2026No. 3:24-cv-00579Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION PAMELA TAYLOR, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:24-cv-579 HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. Defendant * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Defendant Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc.’s (“Haier”) moves for summary judgment on Plaintiff Pamela Taylor’s (“Taylor”) claims. [DE 23]. Taylor responded [DE 26], and Haier replied [DE 28]. Taylor also moves for leave to file a sur-reply. [DE 29]. Haier responded. [DE 30]. The matters are ripe. For the reasons below, the Court DENIES Taylor’s motion to file a sur-reply [DE…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.