Ridge v. Grimes
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
If plaintiffs evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to him, giving him the benefit of all permissible inferences, tended to support all essential elements of actionable negligence, it was sufficient to survive the motion for directed verdict. Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., 49 N.C. App. 638, 272 S.E. 2d 357 (1980), and authorities cited. His evidence, judged by this standard, was sufficient; and directed verdict thus was granted improperly.
The evidence here, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, established the following facts: Defendant, in or about 1969,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rappaport v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Campbell v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- State v. VoncannonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cooper v. Town of Southern PinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Cowan v. Laughridge Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Sullivan v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Peters v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Petty v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.