Legal Opinion

Crislip v. Shanks

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1996No. 94-2221PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

81 F.3d 172

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Patrice Marie CRISLIP, also known as Patrice M. Tindle,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

John SHANKS, Warden; Dr. Devendra Singh; Dr. Arnolfo

Valdvia; Dennis Powell; Cynthia Sanchez; Gerald Padilla;

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Clough v. RushCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. Green v. SeymourCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. Marshall v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  2. Divine Church of God and Christ v. Taxation & Revenue Dept.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  3. Hassan v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API