People v. Nania
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: As part of his omnibus motion, defendant moved to suppress the results of a breathalyzer test upon the ground that the ampoules used in the administration of the test were from a lot that was improperly mixed, and thus, that the test result was unreliable (see, People v Uruburu, 169 AD2d 20). Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the suppression court erred in denying that motion without conducting a hearing. We conclude that a motion addressed to the integrity of the ampoules is not a motion to suppress authorized by CPL 710.20 (5) and that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. UruburuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. NievesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989
- People v. PantaleoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1988
- People v. SherwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. SinghCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992