State v. Joyner
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Pekelis, A.C.J.
Leslie Joyner appeals from a judgment convicting him of rape of a child in the third degree. He claims that he should have a new trial because: (1) he was improperly denied representation by a public defender; (2) he did not knowingly and voluntarily waive his right to counsel; and (3) his right to testify was abridged because he was not permitted to testify in narrative form.
On August 17, 1990, Joyner was charged with the crime of rape of a child in the third degree.1 Joyner applied for appointment of an attorney at public expense at the King County Office of Public Defense…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- City of Bellevue v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Henderson v. CommonwealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. NordstromCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Harrison v. LaursenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- State of Tennessee v. Frank C. PeaseCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- State v. NordstromCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998