Legal Opinion
In re Woodham
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 24, 2001No. D037465PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
Objector Thomas M. Hornung, as the warden of Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (Donovan), appeals an order awarding monetary sanctions (Code Civ. Proc., § 177.5;1 Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2272) against the Board of Prison Terms (the Board) in habeas corpus proceedings brought by petitioner Gene Paul Woodham. Hornung contends punitive sanctions were not a proper remedy under section 177.5 or rule 227 for the Board’s violation of an earlier court order requiring it to respond in a timely manner to administrative appeals filed by Donovan life-term inmates including…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moyal v. LanphearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re MuszalskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. TabbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Seykora v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. Landers, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- County of Riverside v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Sino Century Development Ltd. v. FarleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. WhitusAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2012
- Carian v. Dept. Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.