Legal Opinion
BULLARD v. SAUL
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 22, 2020No. 2:19-cv-05969Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES BULLARD, JR., : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : v. : : NO. 19-5969 ANDREW SAUL, : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION Timothy R. Rice May 21, 2020 U.S. Magistrate Judge Plaintiff James Bullard alleges the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) who found he was not disabled erred by failing to support her determination with substantial evidence and unconstitutionally undertaking a second review of his case. Pl. Br. (doc. 11) at 3. The Commissioner concedes that the ALJ opinion is not supported by substantial evidence, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kacee Chandler v. Commissioner Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Podedworny v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Lucia v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Smith v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Janice Newell v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.